Showing posts with label occupational diseases. Show all posts
Showing posts with label occupational diseases. Show all posts

Wednesday, May 14, 2014

Occupational diseases on the rise: Nfld report

Occupational disease comes from constant
exposure to irritants at work over a long time.
A new report from the Workplace Health, Safety and Compensation Commission (WHSCC) of Newfoundland and Labrador has offered both good and bad news about oh&s in the province.

On one hand, last year’s lost-time incidence rate of 1.6 (meaning 1.6 incidents per 100 workers), the same as the rate for 2012, was the lowest calculated in the WHSCC’s history.

The rate has steadily declined over the past 13 years, the commission claimed in a press release about the report on April 24.

But the report also noted that of the 30 work-related fatalities that had occurred in 2013, 25 of them resulted from occupational illness. This was an increase from 20 occupational disease deaths in 2012.

The province has also seen a rise in the average number of occupational disease fatalities per year over the past decade, according to Leslie Galway, the WHSCC’s chief executive officer.

From 2004 to 2008, the annual average number of deaths from occupational disease was 13; over the subsequent five years, the annual average was 21.

“We’ve been tracking occupational disease and the fatality aspects as one part of that for a long while,” said Galway. “In a working population of this size, we would be concerned with these outcomes.”

Galway defined occupational disease as illness that results from constant exposure to irritants at work over a long period of time.

Common examples of irritants include dust from asbestos or silica, toxic fumes from chemicals and loud noise. The latter can seriously affect hearing over the long run.

As for how the overall rate of workplace injuries and deaths could decline while occupational disease increased, Galway explained that occupational disease is a long-term development.

“So if you think of something like asbestos or silica dust, it’s usually over a career, and it can be that the exposure took place between 10 or 15 years followed by another 20 years of latency while the disease actually develops,” she said.

“So it takes quite a period of time before you actually see this demonstrated as a disease and a claim to the commission.”

Source: OHS Canada

Breathe cleaner and healthier air at work

Breathing toxic dust particles, chemical fumes and other airborne irritants can have a devastating effect on employees' health, well-being, productivity and ability to work.
Granular activated carbon can remove
hundreds of airborne fumes and chemicals.

Electrocorp has designed a wide range of industrial and commercial air cleaners with the right air filters to remove these toxic chemicals, particles and odors quickly and efficiently.

The industrial air purifiers contain many pounds of granular activated carbon, HEPA filters and pre-filters as well as optional UV germicidal filtration to become the most comprehensive air filtration systems on the market.

Contact Electrocorp for more information and a free consultation.

Thursday, May 9, 2013

150 Workers Die Every Day From Injuries or Occupational Diseases According To New Report on Worker Safety and Health

In 2011, 4,693 workers were killed on the job, according to a new AFL-CIO report, “Death on the Job: The Toll of Neglect.”

That is an average of thirteen workers every day. In addition, another estimated 50,000 die every year from occupational diseases – an average of 137 a day, bringing the total worker fatalities to 150 a day. North Dakota, Wyoming, Alaska and Arkansas had the highest workplace fatality rates, while New Hampshire, Rhode Island, and Washington had the lowest. Latino workers, especially those born outside of the United States, continue to face rates of workplace fatalities fourteen percent higher than other workers, the same as last year.

In 2011, 3.8 million workers across all industries experienced work-related illnesses and injuries. The true toll is estimated to be two to three times greater, but lack of reporting in this area results in lower official figures.

The job fatality rate had been declining steadily for many years, but in the past three years the rate has essentially been unchanged, at 3.5 fatalities per 100,000 workers. Similarly, for the past two years, there has been no change in the reported workplace injury and illness rate (3.5 per 100 workers). If we are to make progress in reducing job injuries and deaths, we will need more concerted efforts and additional resources.

This year’s report comes on the heels of a horrific explosion at a fertilizer plant in West, Texas, which killed 15 people, injured hundreds more and caused widespread destruction, as well as the tragic collapse of a building that housed garment factories in Bangladesh, which led to the death of over six hundred workers.

The report also examines the role of the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) 43 years after its creation. It finds that OSHA remains underfunded and understaffed, and that penalties are too low to deter violations. Because of the underfunding, federal OSHA inspectors can only inspect workplaces once every 131 years on average, and state OSHA inspectors would take 76 years to inspect all workplaces.

OSHA penalties are too low to be taken seriously, let alone provide deterrence. The average penalty is only $2,156 for a serious federal health and safety violation, and only $974 for a state violation. Even in cases involving worker fatalities, the median total penalty was a paltry $5,175 for federal OSHA and $4,200 for the OSHA state plans. By contrast, property damage valued between $300 and $10,000 in the state of Illinois is considered a Class 4 felony and can carry a prison sentence of 1 to 3 years and a fine of up to $25,000.

Criminal penalties under OSHA are also weak. While there were 320 criminal enforcement cases initiated under federal environmental laws and 231 defendants charged in FY 2012, only 84 cases related to worker deaths have been prosecuted since 1970.

In the face of an ongoing assault on regulations by business groups and Republicans in Congress, progress on many new important safety and health rules has stalled. The White House Office of Management and Budget has delayed needed protections, including OSHA’s draft proposed silica rule, which has been held up for more than two years.

“In 2013, it is unacceptable that so many hardworking men and women continue to die on the job,” said AFL-CIO President and third-generation coal miner Richard Trumka. “No one should have to sacrifice his or her life or health and safety in order to earn a decent living. Yet, elected leaders, business groups and employers have failed to provide adequate health and safety protections for working families. At the same time, too many politicians and business leaders are actively working to dismantle working people’s right to collectively bargain on the job and speak out against unsafe, unjust working conditions. This is a disgrace to all those who have died. America’s workers deserve better.”

“Death on the Job: The Toll of Neglect” was released after hundreds of Workers Memorial Day vigils, rallies and action were held across the country to commemorate all those workers who died and were injured on the job.

-----------------------------------------------------------------
Cleaner indoor air is associated with an increase in productivity and job satisfaction. Contact an Electrocorp Air Quality Expert to learn more about our industrial air cleaners.

Monday, October 15, 2012

Cancers allegedly caused by GE working conditions

Source: Metroland News:
Roger Fowler has no doubt his time at General Electric is the reason he's been wearing a colostomy bag for the last 20 years. Diagnosed with cancer at age 46, he knew his life would change. His two children were eight and nine years old. He would never return to work. His pension is only a portion of his earnings from 1992, which doesn't add up to much today. But, reading through a list of about 15 co-workers who died of similar cancers, he counts himself lucky.

Ron LeBeau is one of those names. When his cancer was discovered, it had already spread through his body. Doctors gave him four months to live, 10 if he underwent chemotherapy. He died Feb. 9, 1995 at age 39 of stomach cancer, only two months after diagnosis and chemo treatments. A lot of time has passed, but his wife, Sandy LeBeau, is still emotional when she talks about him.

By July 1994, Ron was losing weight. By November, co-workers were covering for him since he didn't have the energy needed to do his job. The big strong man she married lost 100 pounds by the time of his death, having dropped his trademark beard and mustache.

"No one knew him," she says. ¨It's evident going through this with her husband was not easy for Ms LeBeau, but she's thankful his renovations to the house had allowed her to go into business as a hairdresser. Times were tough raising two teenage girls without a father and on a much-reduced income. Things would definitely have been a bit easier if her husband's illness and death had been officially acknowledged as a result of working conditions at GE, something she believes.

Both Ms LeBeau and Mr. Fowler are looking to have their claims reassessed as new science is able to link certain illnesses to workplace conditions.

They're hoping the Log Jam Summit held this summer might help get them the compensation and recognition they feel is due.

The summit included the Workplace Safety and Insurance Board, Occupational and Environmental Health Coalition of Peterborough, Ontario Health Clinics for Ontario Workers, the Office of the Worker Advisor, retirees, union members, and the families of those who died from occupational diseases.

The idea is to look into links between the workplace and disease using modern science and to address the backlog of claims.

As a response to this story, Kim Warburton, vice-president of communications and public affairs with GE, issued a statement through e-mail.

When asked if GE Peterborough employees had died from hazardous chemicals or materials from the workplace, she wrote that GE does not provide personal information on current or former employees.

GE did comply with safety standards through the 1960s to the mid-1990s, she states, which is the time Mr. Fowler and Mr. LeBeau worked there.

Having operated in Peterborough since 1892, she states that like most industrial plants in operation for more than 100 years, GE has changed business operations and established robust environmental health and safety practices.

"As industry and society in general have become aware of the potential hazards of certain materials, chemicals, in manufacturing, GE has quickly responded by phasing-out and substituting the use of many substances that were considered to have hazardous properties," she writes.

She writes that GE's health and safety program annually meets or exceeds standards from all levels of government as well as third party independent contractors. There are on-site clinics and joint health and safety committees within the unions and the use of toxic chemicals has been significantly reduced over the years.

In 1994, she writes that the health and safety committee raised in the issue of excess cancers and union members were advised to submit claims to the WSIB. In 2004, the union established on-site clinics for members and retirees to discuss health matters and apply for compensation.

Since 1994, she writes that 300 claims were filed with about 112 compensated so far. The majority of the chemical related claims date back many years, she writes, adding that GE is not aware of any health related claims from the last 20 years.

There have not been similar claims from other GE locations.

Part of the problem is the assessment process, which only looks at one type of exposure, not the cumulation of different things.

Mr. Fowler says his claim is only related to asbestos, but he knows the chemicals he worked with did not help his health.รข?¨Though he knows he was exposed to asbestos throughout his career, he has only been given partial credit for the 22.5 years he spent at GE. That means he his exposure works out to 10 years worth, but he's told he needs 15 years to qualify for compensation.

He could see it in the dust in the air as he's entered the building every morning. When forklift drivers would bump into pipes, he could see pieces of asbestos shake loose. Plus, he says it was all over his work station.

One issue that bothers him is the dangers from other work stations are not factored in, even though there were no walls between the stations.

Mr. LeBeau, he notes, likely got the worst of it since he operated the crane that ran along the ceiling where all the vapours rose. The building has since been demolished.

Since his cancer, Mr. Fowler has had surgeries annually.

The lifestyle change of having a colostomy bag has affected travel and visits with friends. His stomach sometimes acts up and has unpleasant results.

"You never get used to it," he says.

With so many co-workers who became sick, he says it's just too many to be coincidence.

He doesn't resent GE, noting he had great people to work with and the pay was great.

Back in the 1970s and 80s, he says no one said the things they were working with were dangerous. Employees even took bags of asbestos to insulate their homes, he adds.

"God knows what chemicals we used in friction motors," he says.

By the time gloves and coveralls were provided, it was too late for some.

"If I won my case, I could open the door and help people," he says.

At one point, he collapsed at work from chemical exposure, but that can't be factored into his asbestos claim. He also can't mention the growth he had removed from his throat.

He hasn't found his union to be helpful after he had to leave work and no longer pay dues. He was initially denied his claim two weeks before Christmas and it took him two months to tell his wife.

Ms LeBeau remembers how her husband used to destroy his clothes at work. If she bought him something nice to wear, she'd have to hide it to keep it clean. He'd come home with amber glass through his hair.

"Ron did think he was in a dangerous environment," she says.

Ms LeBeau lost her father and two uncles to cancer, which she aslo attributes to their time spent at GE.

"My whole family has been involved with GE," she says.

Asbestos, she says, was everywhere in his work environment, including mitts, blankets and the brakes on his crane.

He quit smoking two years before his death, but Ms LeBeau believes being a smoker hindered his workplace illness claim.

She knows no compensation could replace him.

"I talk about Ron every day," she says.